Showing posts with label Martin Scorsese. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Martin Scorsese. Show all posts

Friday, July 16, 2010

DAVE CHAPPELLE'S BLOCK PARTY isn't really a concert film

I'm not much of one for concert films. I've never even been able to get through Scorsese's THE LAST WALTZ, and Marty's my boy. There's something about films based on music that just doesn't translate to a visual medium for me. Often times the cinematography of these films seems to be about the ephemera of the moment, the clanging of a cymbal or the vibration of a guitar chord. It's something momentary, and doesn't really give much to think on. Ultimately, I find a lot of these films boring.


So what happens when an uber-visualist like Michel Gondry tackles the medium? Nothing world-shattering. DAVE CHAPPELLE'S BLOCK PARTY is too long and steadily loses momentum, like a marathon runner that starts too fast and ends up limping across the finish line.

The film isn't really about anything: there's a vague the-healing-power-of-music thing going on underneath some of the scenes, there's a bunch of the-curse-of-fame stuff with Chappelle and Lauryn Hill, and some sort of commentary on community and giving back, but the film isn't really about any of these things. It jumps all over the place, from Chappelle organizing the event, to running through rehearsals, to handing out tickets to white people, to the actual show and then back again. The fragmented timeline is very distracting, as just when you're getting into some really good music, we're back to a ten-minute segment on some hippies who live in the area. It's like Gondry isn't content to just document the show, he's got to make this film about more than the music. And while I welcome the attempt, I'm ultimately frustrated by the movie's split focus.

This film would have been infinitely better if it was presented in a chronological fashion, from Chappelle organizing the show through to it's triumphant conclusion. It would have given us a thematic throughline to follow, but instead the film is all chopped up and the message is lost. Part of the problem seems to be that the show might have been a bit of a dud. It's clear that much of the afternoon was drenched in rain, and that there were technical issues throughout the day. It may be that there just wasn't enough good concert footage to fully use.

DAVE CHAPPELLE'S BLOCK PARTY is a concert film that desperately tries to be more than just a concert film, and fails at being either.

Friday, June 18, 2010

Seriously, how good is RAGING BULL?

I think we can all agree that RAGING BULL is freaking awesome. I can't think of a better looking black-and-white film:

Fun fact: did you know the DP, Michael Chapman, also shot SPACE JAM? And that Jay-Z wrote the immortal Bugs Bunny rap "Buggin'"? Keep that one in your back pocket the next time your friends are playing Six Degrees of Separation.

Anyway, aside from the awe-inspiring visuals, I think what's really interesting about this film is the structure of it: for a story that spans thirty years, it's really a movie made up of long character-based scenes that allow Robert DeNiro to give his finest performance (bearing in mind that I haven't seen EVERYBODY'S FINE). The scene in the prison cell where he goes from punching the wall and screaming "WHY?" to moaning "I'm not an animal" is burned into my consciousness.

A perfectly told story of jealousy and anger, RAGING BULL deserves its reputation as the best movie of the 1980s.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

THE DEPARTED vs. INFERNAL AFFAIRS: There should be only one

I try not to be one of those guys who hates something once it gets popular. I like discovering things, feeling like I'm in on a secret, but I also love being part of a cultural movement that appreciates an artist given the budget to do whatever they want.


Martin Scorsese is finally enjoying the mass popularity he so richly deserves. MEAN STREETS? AFTER HOURS? RAGING BULL? GOODFELLAS? All exceptional films, undoubtedly the work of a master. But the film that really kicked off this Marty love-fest is THE DEPARTED, a remake of a Hong Kong film called INFERNAL AFFAIRS.


But I really don't like THE DEPARTED, and I'd rather watch INFERNAL AFFAIRS almost every time. I'm not against remakes in principal (I think the ASSAULT ON PRECINCT 13 remake is superior to John Carpenter's original), or even in Scorsese's specific example (CAPE FEAR, anyone?). But THE DEPARTED takes an overly serious tone to its subject matter and is way too long.

This is a 151-minute movie about moles. That's crazy. If your story is about something we've seen hundreds of times before, you want to make your point as quickly and as entertainingly as possible. But Marty is way too interested in the underlying psychology of the characters, even the ones on the periphery of the storyline. So there's a lot of comments like, "So your father was a drunk?" while people stare deep into each other's eyes.

Am I the only one that feels like Thelma Schoonmaker's been trying a little too hard with the last couple of Scorsese films? It seems like she's forgotten that the best editing is the sort you don't notice. SHUTTER ISLAND had a lot of "Look At My Interesting Cutting" moments, and THE DEPARTED has a ton of distracting cross-cutting in between extended dialogue scenes with seemingly no purpose but to show the similarities between Damon and DiCaprio. And the Jack Nicholson scenes do not add anything to the plot or the character, and smack of contractually obligated screen time.

Not to say that I hate THE DEPARTED. There's some very strong work turned in by Alec Baldwin, Martin Sheen, Damon, DiCaprio, and even Mark Wahlberg. That's a lot of testosterone flowing around, which makes for some great dude moments, like when Leo screams at his handlers, "Do you want them to chop me up and feed me to the poor?" or any time Alec Baldwin opens his glorious mouth. And the Boston accents! Good Lord the Boston accents! At the very least this movie will make you want take a trip to Boston just so that you can hear the banter.

But INFERNAL AFFAIRS has none of the pretensions of THE DEPARTED. It's basically like the pared-down, plot-only version of Scorsese's film. The film sets up the double agents with a relentless opening sequence and moves quickly into the big sting operation where both bosses realize they've been infiltrated - in about half the time of its American counterpart.

This is not to say INFERNAL AFFAIRS is perfect - far from it. Some might argue that the film is too plot-heavy, and that the characters suffer for it. The Matt Damon character in INFERNAL AFFAIRS is played by Andy Lau, and he certainly suffers from a lack of backstory. We never really understand why he's working for the mob, so the ultimate payoff isn't very rewarding.

INFERNAL AFFAIRS also has one of those awful Hong Kong soundtracks of strange J-pop hits, while Scorsese's use of music is still strong: he uses my boy Nas' Thief's Theme (major points Marty), Pink Floyd's Comfortably Numb, and Dropkick Murphys' I'm Shipping Up To Boston in unforgettable and exciting ways.

Really, the titles say it all - Scorsese's film is a character-heavy film interested in death, while the original is a straightforward story of corruption. I wish I could add some of the scenes from THE DEPARTED into INFERNAL AFFAIRS, but sadly, both films are flawed (while fun).